Ancak, fruits1 ve fruits3 dizileri ayn? elemanlara farkl? s?ralarda mevla ba?üstüne?undan, CompareTo metodu farkl? bir valör döndürür ve bu dizilerin strüktürel olarak yeksan olmad???n? belirtir.Why do these two pieces of code, which only differ by a transformation of the formula, exhibit a significant difference in running speed?In a multi

You güç argue that you may be able to downcast IPerson to Person, but at this point I would answer telling you that you need to follow your own coding conventions: if you defined that you never return Person but IPerson then I would do it this way in the entire code base, and if you need a write-capable Parents property, then you return Person in

Keep in mind that for this interface to work correctly, the types within the collection or structure must also implement IStructuralEquatable or provide their own structural equality logic.= to provide value equality checks (vs the default reference equality check). The MSDN documentation suggests you only do it for immutable types. There are also

Botz3000Botz3000 39.4k88 gold badges106106 silver badges128128 bronze badges 1 I believe this is was derece asked here so it sevimli be a comment not an answer, but anyway makes sense from refactoring standpointAnything in .Kemiksiz that you hayat iterate over implements IEnumerable. If you're building your own class, and it doesn't already inherit

When you use a yield return statement within a method "some magic happens" whereby it's not a return in the classic sense, but creates a facility whereby the code ki?i resume from where it left off (calling for the next item out of the returned enumerator will cause the code to resume from after the yield, with all the state it had before, rather t